NEW ORLEANS – Just under a day after Roger Goodell passionately emphasized the NFL’s dedication to DEI to commence another week filled with hype and excellence, news emerged that the most popular sports league in the country has chosen to remove its “End Racism” slogan from a prominent end zone location during Super Bowl 59.
What a blunder.
Certainly, you can’t dislike the “Choose Love” and “It Takes All Of Us” slogans that will be displayed at the back of the end zones at the Caesars Superdome on Sunday – when over 200 million viewers are anticipated to tune in for at least part of the matchup between the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles.
However, it’s a missed chance at a moment when “End Racism” is a message that undoubtedly should be voiced in our country – and, considering the worldwide audience the NFL aims to expand, should originate from our country.
This is even more relevant when taking into account another piece of pregame information that emerged on Tuesday: President Donald Trump is arriving.
Trump, who recklessly and maliciously accused DEI for the mid-air crash near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport last week that claimed the lives of 67 individuals while courageous first responders were still retrieving bodies from the Potomac River, will become the first sitting president to go to a Super Bowl.
That’s an individual who should encounter “End Racism” messaging – even if just as a subconscious prompt of societal duty. However, clearly as something much more profound.
The NFL’s Super 59 end zone slogans recognize a range of tragic national events this year – such as the medical jet crash in Philadelphia, the catastrophic wildfires in Los Angeles, the New Year’s assault in the French Quarter, not far from the Superdome, and the crash near Washington, D.C., which involved an Army helicopter and a regional commercial jet.
Nonetheless, the NFL doesn’t need to dismiss the direct message recognizing racism in our society while also honoring the other tragedies. The “End Racism” slogan has been commonly featured in NFL end zone visuals since 2021, following a significant “racial reckoning” sparked by the tragic death of a Black man, George Floyd, which ignited protests and a surge of DEI initiatives in corporate America.
With Trump returning to the White House, targeting DEI programs and principles while appointing loyalists with questionable backgrounds to important positions, the timing is particularly unfortunate for the NFL to eliminate its “End Racism” slogan.
The NFL, despite its immense power, ought to uphold its slogan as a matter of principle. Make a daring declaration, regardless of “who dat” is in the arena.
Discuss stepping back by five paces.
“We began our diversity initiatives because we believed it was the correct course for the National Football League, and we shall persist in these efforts as we have not only convinced ourselves, but I believe we have demonstrated that it enhances the NFL,” Goodell stated at his state-of-the-NFL press conference on Monday, when I inquired about the league’s DEI commitment amid the Trump administration and a trend in corporate America where many companies have scaled back their DEI initiatives.
Goodell stated: “We’re not involved in this due to it being a trend to enter or exit.” Our initiatives are crucial in our attempt to draw the top talent to the NFL, both on the field and behind the scenes.
The Commissioner wasn’t referring specifically to the alteration in the end zone slogan, which only became known on Tuesday morning following a report by Mike Silver in The Athletic. Goodell referenced the Rooney Rule, which mandates that NFL teams interview a minimum of two external minority candidates for head coach and general manager roles, and is a fundamental component of the league’s DEI initiatives.
That’s still commendable, even as discussions about the efficacy of the Rooney Rule persist and outcomes concerning hirings and firings provoke doubts about true commitments.
That remains commendable, even while discussions persist regarding the efficacy of the Rooney Rule and outcomes related to hiring and firing spark doubts about the dedication of some to fair opportunities.
However, it is evident that actions convey more meaning than words in this matter. By eliminating the end zone slogan that recognizes racism, the NFL might have unintentionally conveyed a different message – we are not very concerned about it – to a significant portion of its fan base that is frequently marginalized.
Goodell, despite his efforts to diversify the staff at league headquarters and promote DEI initiatives, should be more aware.
Keep in mind that the NFL is always observed and analyzed. Whether it acts as a socially responsible corporate leader or not, that also gets attention.
On the other hand, it could be mere coincidence that we discovered the “End Racism” slogan release just as Trump is scheduled to attend the Super Bowl. Or simply sheer luck.
Nonetheless, it presents poor optics for the NFL.
It makes me contemplate: Is the NFL at risk from Trump? If you believe the league – noted for its huge television ratings and increasing franchise values – is shielded from any critiques from the president, reconsider.
Recall Colin Kaepernick and the protests during the national anthem?
When Trump criticized players for their protests at a rally, it highlighted the significant target the NFL can become. Now it’s reasonable to question if the league is aware of the chance of additional attacks.
In 2024, America First Legal, established by Stephen Miller, targeted the NFL among over a dozen companies, alleging that the DEI initiatives were illegal and biased against white individuals – and urged the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to look into the league.
That move, which involved sending a letter to Goodell, failed to influence the NFL.
However, Miller, who was an advisor in the initial Trump administration, is currently serving as deputy chief of staff and advisor for U.S. Homeland Security. Considering the anti-DEI measures and discourse coming from the White House, it’s reasonable to assume that Goodell and others may feel somewhat anxious about the threat of an assault on the Rooney Rule, which is a vital part of broader DEI initiatives for the league.
Indeed, it requires each one of us. And we must select love. Nevertheless, in this social context, there are certain messages – particularly related to the event that will attract the largest audience of the year – that the NFL should feel free to communicate.