• Thu. Mar 13th, 2025

Maduro Calls Guyana “Fascist,” Criticizes Exxon’s Presence in Essequibo as “Illegal

Bynaomisports

Mar 13, 2025 #Guyana

Maduro Calls Guyana “Fascist,” Criticizes Exxon’s Presence in Essequibo as “Illegal”

In a fiery speech, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro branded Guyana a “fascist” state and denounced the presence of multinational oil company ExxonMobil in the disputed Essequibo region as “illegal.” The remarks, which escalate tensions between the two neighboring nations, come amid growing controversy over the oil exploration activities in the area, which both Venezuela and Guyana claim as part of their territory.

Tensions Over the Essequibo Region

The Essequibo region has been at the center of a long-standing territorial dispute between Venezuela and Guyana. Venezuela has historically claimed the region, which accounts for around two-thirds of Guyana’s landmass, asserting that it was unlawfully ceded to Britain, Guyana’s colonial ruler, in the 19th century. On the other hand, Guyana maintains that the land belongs to them, with their sovereignty recognized internationally, especially after the 1966 Geneva Agreement between the two nations aimed at finding a peaceful resolution to the issue.

The discovery of vast oil reserves in the offshore area near Essequibo has added a new layer of complexity to the dispute. ExxonMobil and its partners have been conducting oil exploration in the region for several years, leading to increasing tensions as Venezuela seeks to assert its claim over the territory. Maduro’s rhetoric reflects a growing frustration in Caracas over the growing foreign interest in the contested waters and the implications for Venezuela’s territorial ambitions.

Maduro’s Accusations

In his speech, Maduro did not hold back in his criticism of both Guyana and ExxonMobil. He accused Guyana’s government of fascism for allowing foreign companies like ExxonMobil to operate in the disputed area, calling it an act of “collaboration” with imperialist interests. According to Maduro, Guyana’s stance on the Essequibo dispute was not based on national interest but rather on aligning with Western powers, particularly the United States, which he claims is using ExxonMobil to further its geopolitical agenda in the region.

The Venezuelan leader also emphasized that Exxon’s presence in Essequibo, as part of its oil exploration activities, was illegal under international law. Venezuela claims that ExxonMobil’s operations, under the auspices of the Guyanese government, constitute a direct violation of Venezuela’s territorial integrity. He reiterated his government’s commitment to defending Venezuela’s sovereignty over the Essequibo region, despite calls from the international community to settle the dispute peacefully through arbitration or negotiations.

International Reactions and Concerns

Maduro’s remarks have drawn a mixed reaction from the international community. While Venezuela’s position on the issue has been well known, this latest outburst has raised concerns about the potential for escalating hostilities. The United Nations and other international bodies have long urged both nations to resolve the dispute through diplomatic means, but with increasing oil exploration activity in the region, the situation remains fraught with tension.

The involvement of ExxonMobil has also attracted criticism from human rights groups and environmentalists, who argue that the oil exploration activities could cause significant harm to the environment. Meanwhile, Guyana has firmly rejected Venezuela’s claims, asserting its sovereignty over the Essequibo region and its right to develop the resources found in the area.

The Road Ahead

As the situation continues to unfold, the international community remains on edge, with calls for both sides to de-escalate tensions and engage in dialogue. The dispute over Essequibo is far from resolved, and with Venezuela’s fiery rhetoric and Guyana’s continued oil exploration, it is unclear how the situation will evolve. Nonetheless, the need for a peaceful and diplomatic resolution remains critical, both for the stability of the region and the future of energy resources in the contested area.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *